Thanks for this thought-provoking summary--I think about this a lot because I'm trying to use computer models to simulate competition between plants for light and soil resources, as well as facilitation, where shade or nutrient inputs create a more conducive environment for neighbors. Simulations can create experimental conditions that can't be done in the field, but they're also so incredibly simplified that it's more of a thought experiment!
I think it can be problematic when the results of such experiments are filtered through popular media, which doesn't convey the limitations and nuance, since most reporters lack the training to understand such factors, let alone meaningfully pass them along to readers/viewers.
Yes, definitely. And if we're talking about places where agriculture has been practiced, much of this life has possibly been wiped out by pesticides and fungicides.
merely the suggestion of challenging the 'Invasives Narrative' has sent my friends into a state of shock and blind rage, NOT an exaggeration and a bit of a shock - to me! - Kolibri's superb exposition of the scientific research on competition and how it is done - and how it should be done better - is going to make some heads explode
Sometimes I wonder if this idea of 'competition' is actually an anthropomorphist imposition onto plants... and other life. And obviously, like in other scenarios as well, what makes competition an objective measurable scientific standard is not agreed upon, just like measuring 'biodiversity' as well.
Thanks for this thought-provoking summary--I think about this a lot because I'm trying to use computer models to simulate competition between plants for light and soil resources, as well as facilitation, where shade or nutrient inputs create a more conducive environment for neighbors. Simulations can create experimental conditions that can't be done in the field, but they're also so incredibly simplified that it's more of a thought experiment!
Thought experiments are valuable too for sure.
I think it can be problematic when the results of such experiments are filtered through popular media, which doesn't convey the limitations and nuance, since most reporters lack the training to understand such factors, let alone meaningfully pass them along to readers/viewers.
Very true
Also, soil microbes and fungal networks add a whole other dimension to how plants thrive or don't in a given environment...
Yes, definitely. And if we're talking about places where agriculture has been practiced, much of this life has possibly been wiped out by pesticides and fungicides.
merely the suggestion of challenging the 'Invasives Narrative' has sent my friends into a state of shock and blind rage, NOT an exaggeration and a bit of a shock - to me! - Kolibri's superb exposition of the scientific research on competition and how it is done - and how it should be done better - is going to make some heads explode
Sometimes I wonder if this idea of 'competition' is actually an anthropomorphist imposition onto plants... and other life. And obviously, like in other scenarios as well, what makes competition an objective measurable scientific standard is not agreed upon, just like measuring 'biodiversity' as well.